Useful Snippets


This blog is used to collect useful snippets related to Linux, PHP, MySQL and more. Feel free to post comments with improvements or questions!

Are your smart devices spying on you? Make better purchasing choices and find products that respect your privacy at

RSS Latest posts from my personal blog

Most viewed posts

Subscribe to RSS feed

DiskCryptor and Windows 10 – does it work?

Stanislav KhromovStanislav Khromov


There’s not a lot of information about DiskCryptor and Windows 10 online. Development of DC has stalled a bit but it’s still a very stable and useful piece of software. Here are answers to some common questions:

Does DiskCryptor work with Windows 10?

Yes, DiskCryptor works with all versions of Windows 10 including the Anniversary Update. (At the moment of writing this blog post, the latest build number is 14393 / 1607.)

Does DiskCryptor work with ReFS filesystems?

Yes, DiskCryptor works with ReFS filesystems.

Does DiskCryptor work with storage spaces?

Yes, DiskCryptor works with Windows Storage Spaces. I have also tried to physically move a storage space from one PC to another while encrypted, and it works just fine on the new computer as well.

dc-refs DiskCryptor running on a storage space that uses ReFS.

Does DiskCryptor work with the software RAID in Windows 10?


Can you boot from an ReFS filesystem when using DiskCryptor?

No, but Windows 10 doesn’t support booting from ReFS disks, so it’s not a DC issue.

Will DiskCryptor work when rebooting to do an update?

Generally – yes. Some of the biggest Windows updates (like the Anniversary Update) might give you issues. It rarely leads to a serious problem other than the computer booting into troubleshooting mode and typically you can just reboot again and Windows will revert any attempted updates.

However, fixing this is trivial. Simply decrypt your boot drive first, and then apply the update. You can then encrypt your drive again once the update is installed. Note that this is only required on the boot drive, not any other drives attached to the system. Typically you also don’t have to uninstall the bootloader, but you can do so if you wish via Tools > Config bootloader.

Web Developer at Aftonbladet (Schibsted Media Group)
Any opinions on this blog are my own and do not reflect the views of my employer.
Twitter Profile
Visit my other blog

Comments 7
  • Anonymous
    Posted on

    Anonymous Anonymous

    Reply Author

    Never ever decrypt a disk and encrypt it again, real data will be accessible with forensic tools.

    HDD, SDD, Memory Cards, etc. can be readed in forensic and get near the 83 last states.

    To ensure data will not be recoverable you need to do a wipe with at least 100 pass with special patterns, that way a forensic will not be able to get the data that the disk / memory had on the past.

    Such forensic is done in laboratories, analizing how the physical particles are.

    Each bit of data is not really a 0 or a 1, if you write the same value twice on the same position, the physical medium can be seen different than doing a write of a 0 after a write of a 1, etc.

    Of course, the controller of the medium will not let you get such old data, but a more datailed scan of the material can get such data… that is the way some companies can recover 100% of your data after a full 100% surface format… but it has a cost.

    Just as an example, recover tha last 5 states of a position (normally a 4KiB) on a disk can cost 500 euros, recovering a HDD of 500GiB can cost 1200 euros, but recovering last 10 states of such disk can cost some million of euros, most of the cost is because it is needed more than a month of supercomputing, not to mention last 83 (the top most record i know had gotten one company as a proof of concept).

    Getting such 83 last states was done on a 32MiB block and took more than five years of supercomputing, but they got 100% of all 83 last states… they tried for the 84 last state and only got near 85% of the data.

    Decrypting a disk over a non-encrypted disk is very risky, the data will be on plain and will still be accesible at least until it will be overwritten near 83 or more times.

    So i use this technique to ensure i am on the safe line (all done on a secured with physical access control)… warning… it can take a full month to do it with a 500GiB system partition:

    1.- Decrypt over the disk, so it will be normal and accesible by anyone
    2.- Clone the partition, to be safe, over a secured encrypted disk (a disk i prepared that after being encrypted and mounted has been wiped at least 100 times, including 100% of the partition, not only data zones, and then formated so i can write files on it and be sure any last state, at least 100, will be garbage)
    3.- Do what ever i need to update the system that would not work if encrypted
    4.- Do another clone on that secured disk i mention in step 2
    5.- Encrypt over the disk, so now it is encrypted… but not yet safe, last 83 states can be recovered, and last states where not encrypted
    6.- Do another clone of the encrypted version (not mounted) over such secured disk i mentioned on step 2
    7. Do at least 100 wipe passes on all the disk with garbage and special patterns, this way last states will not be agle to be recovered with laboratory forensic techniques… this step can took more than a month
    8. Recover the encrypted clone (the one i did on step 6), so now the disk presents the same data as on step 6, but between step 2 and 8 the disk has been wiped at least 100 times.

    That is it, a lot of work to ensure clear data will not be recoverable from the disk.

    Not to mention, i use a cascade algorithms, muti password levels, keyfiles, etc.

    Be secure implies be slow, really slow.

    If you do not want such level of security… do a different thing… use a Read Only Live Distro on the disk (no need to encrypt nothing, because nothing can be written), mount an external media where your data is and work with it, unmount it and put such data on a secured place.

    There are the two options… Windows way (slow encryption multi layer) or Linux way (Read Only Distros with all software you need).

    If you need to upgrade/update Linux software on a Distro… boot with it, recreate the new ISO, then replace old one with the new one… or better, have both and edit bootloader to let choose, so you can test the new one prior to replace the old one with the new one.

    Yes, Linux can boot a distro from inside an ISO (if that distro is prepared for that, for ecample it initramfs is configured to loop mount the iso).

    Another good thing of Read Only Linux Distros is that they allways boot identically (if no hardware fail or is changed) and they do not need to write anything anywhere, they do such writes on a ram drive that get lost on next reboot, but they can mount anything you want on read/write.

    Once someone has discovered / used one of such distros, never ever again want to use a normal Linux installed on the disk.

    Just as a point… on some of them you can also mount in read/write another medium and put it in join way (better said differencing) so any block of the ISO file can be written, but not on the ISO itself, on the differencing file… so you can install software, etc… also you can reboot and mantain such changes until you want to throuth them away.

    The nearest concept most known for most people is the Inmutable and not auto-reset functions of a VirtualBox Disk… but for your real system.

    It is like taking a snapshot of your system, but much better… a snapshot can be edited by malware, the ISO file not… Kernel mounts it in Read Only and if you do not set a mount point for holder, it will no be accesable.

    Just to clarify that… the ISO is under a path on a mount point (only visible on initramfs), such mount point will not be visible by the kernel after mount rootfs. Warning: It will not be possible to unmount it, so do not use any filesystem that needs unmount… that is why i allways talk about ISO… but is it really a RAW image, not an ISO 9660 FileSystem, Joliet, etc.

    Or do it also better, like me if you are as paranoid as me… Put an Ext4 on the whole disk… now search for a sector to sector zone on the free space and use a loop mount of that area as the rootfs… Linux system is hidden… of course this needs a two level of LUKs without headers to make a search on the disk not be able to find it… and a Grub2 on external medium that let you type the mount commands… done with a mini linux kernel + initramfs that presents a console prompt that let me loop mount the rootfs and then load the kernel & initiram of the hidden Linux, warning, the initramfs of that Linux must also have that console prompt and i need to type twice per boot such mount commands, one to be able to read kernel and initramfs, one for the Linux have rootfs mounted. Paranoid way.

    Windows sucks, it does not let me hide it (while running it on real hardware), so i prefer to use VirtualBox under such hidden Read Only Linux Distro and over it the Windows… and of course the differencing RAW file i use for such Hidden Read Only Linux is stored over a LUKs container, so i can reboot and not loose apps i installed, etc… when i am happy with new configuration i recreate the RAW image for such Hidden Read Only Linux and test it, after really happy i replace the old one with the new one. The system allways boots without any write to disk (unless i order the oposite, aka mount the diff file) and i can use my external data in R/W way, also secured the same way.

    I carry all that on a disk inside a USB 3.1 Gen2 TypeC (10Gi/s) enclosure, so my PC has no internal medium., so i can boot my Linux in near any PC, BIOS only or U-EFI (i put both Grub2 versions), and i only need 1GiB of RAM (2GiB or more if i want to run Windows under VirtualBox, depends on what Windows i want to run).

    • Stanislav Khromov
      Posted on

      Stanislav Khromov Stanislav Khromov

      Reply Author

      Interesting comment. I’m not sure it’s a healthy level of paranoia for the regular citizen though. :-)

      Also, wiping a 500GB SSD 100 times will introduce a lot of wear. Most SSDs have something like 1000 write cycles before starting to fail. So if anything, it’s quite impractical.

  • JKB
    Posted on


    Reply Author

    Will Diskcryptor work with Windows 10 & UEFI if only use is to encrypt non system drives? Little paranoid about encrypting main drive with the windows update problems I have heard. Encrypting SD drives allows interchangability with my Diskcryptor Windows 7 computers and of course protects the data.

    • Stanislav Khromov
      Posted on

      Stanislav Khromov Stanislav Khromov

      Reply Author

      Hey JKB,

      I believe UEFI only affects the boot drive, so you should be absolutely fine to encrypt your non-boot drives with DC. GPT also works for non-boot drives.

      I would also not be paranoid about booting from DC and using Windows updates – the past problematic updates were large ones (like win10 to win10 anniversary) and caused issues across the board with encryption software like TrueCrypt and VeraCrypt as well.

  • Denise
    Posted on

    Denise Denise

    Reply Author

    Thanks for this blog entry, Mr. Khromov!

    As of 2020, I am still using Diskcryptor on Windows 10 (1909). Sadly, the offical Diskcryptor site seems to be abandoned. Is Diskcryptor still safe to use? Do you still use it? I thought about migrating to VeraCrypt, but Diskcryptor still works absolutely fine.

    Sincere regards

    • Stanislav Khromov
      Posted on

      Stanislav Khromov Stanislav Khromov

      Reply Author

      Hey Denise,

      I haven’t personally heard of any ways to attack DiskCryptor.

      Apparently it’s also safe enough to use as ransomware:

      I have switched some systems over to use VeraCrypt instead of DiskCryptor, since Vera has active development. It has the same features. The main issue I have with Vera is that it takes a really long time between password entry and decryption. Imagine waiting 15 seconds times the number of drives you have on startup. I guess that in itself is also a good thing, because it would take a long time to brute force the password.

  • John
    Posted on

    John John

    Reply Author

    Hi Stanislav, thank you for your information about this program. I would be planning using it, but i dont know if it is safe, because i have UEFI and i have few different partitions:
    C – the system one ntfs
    volume 4 – the 512 mb – i dont know where this came from ntfs
    D-the drivers partition ntfs
    and volume 1 – the 100 mb partition which is fat32 filesystem and it is efi partition

    Now, would it be safe to encrypt only the c, which is the system one, given that im using uefi ?
    Thanks for the info.